Post by mimi1 on Nov 5, 2012 14:56:44 GMT -8
[atrb=border,0,true][atrb=cellpadding,0,true] XANDER LUCAS BLACKWOOD male , thirty-three , ian somerhalder, mimi life was never easy for xander blackwood. he clawed, scratched, and fought for every penny he earned and every title he gained. needless to say, it totally payed off. why? well now he's the hottest commodity for his age range in hollywood. the suave, debonaire actor is officially a triple threat. he does movies and tv, models, and then on top of it all is a philanthropist, and had been one from an early age. when he was twenty-three, while on scene for a movie, xander made a life altering decision. he adopted a thirteen year old boy by the name of riley, and took him under his wing. though it wasn't a glamorous thing to have to deal with the tantrums and anger issues that the boy possessed, xander viewed riley as a true son – even to the point of giving him his last name in the paperwork, and then getting him into the movie business. in more modern times xander does have a predicament. for you see he had always been a playboy – an acting tony stark if you would like to draw comparisons. he had a different woman in his bed every night, a different date every weekend, and a different playmate for every vacation. but now that he's thirty-three, that needs to change as far as he's concerned. dating seriously is now a number one priority, and luckily there's no shortage of women that would want to be his arm candy. at the same time he has to be there for his son, who's been causing more and more issues with directors as time progresses. then, to top it all off – of course he has to give time to his one true love, the fans and the networks which hire him. of course it will all even out in due time, but the adding stress has caused him to usually find solace in pretending to be a normal person, even if it embarrasses his son greatly. the way xander sees it is that if he wants to quit one day, he will with no hesitation. because when you're on top, where else is there to go but downward? |